Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union

Estonia, Supreme Court, case no 3-3-1-32-15, Judgement of 15 September 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

Estonia, Supreme Court, Case no. 3-3-1-11-16, Judgement of 22 March 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security -

European Union, CJEU, A v. B and Others, judgment of 11 September 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, A, B and C, Judgement of 4 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: The Netherlands - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life -

European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial -

European Union, CJEU, Abdoulaye Amadou Tall, judgement of 17 December 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

European Union, CJEU, Alassini et al., Judgement of 18 March 2010

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Italy - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

European Union, CJEU, Alder, judgement of 19 December 2012

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Poland - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Aranyosi and Căldăraru, judgment of 5 April 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

11-20 of 97 total results - Page: 1 2 > ... 8 9 10