Spain, Constitutional Court, STC 198/2012, 6 November 2012

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 9 - Right to marry and right to found a family - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination -

Spain, Tribunal Constitucional, Sentencia 198/2012, Constitutionality of same-sex marriage

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Spain - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Consumer protection - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Sexual orientation - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Sexual orientation -

Sweden, Gothenburg District Court, B 2683-09, Decision 25 January 2011

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

Sweden, Scania and Blekinge Court of Appeal, B985-12, decision 11 April 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -

Sweden, Solna District Court, Decision of 3 May 2016, B 2768-16

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture -

Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning, INJA 2013 s 502, Decision of 11 June 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

Sweden, Supreme Court, Decision of November 30 2016, case Ö 5052-16

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination -

The Netherlands, Court of first instance of The Hague, branch Zwolle, n. 14/4276, 27 January 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: The Netherlands - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

The Netherlands, Court of first instance of the Hague, Middelburg branch, Judgment of 11 August 2015

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Spill-over dimension -

Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 10 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition -

The Netherlands, Judicial division of the Council of State, 201208550/1/V2, supreme, Judgement of 8 July 2015

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture -

81-90 of 97 total results - Page: 1 2 3 ... < 9 10