Romania, Court of Appeal Bucharest, NGO ACCEPT v the National Council for Combating Discrimination

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Sexual orientation -

Romania, Court of Appeal Cluj, Judgement of May 31st 2013

Conflict: Conflict of rights -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Protocol 12, Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination -

Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12, Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination -

Romania, Court of first instance, Case no. 345494-2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Romania, Curtea Constituțională a României (Romanian Constitutional Court), 424 D/2014 & 478/D/2014, 8 july 2014

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Proportionality test -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

Romania, Curtea de Appel Cluj, (Court of Appeal Cluj), 740/33/2013, Smaranda Bara and Others v. Casa Națională de Asigurări de Sănătate and Others, appellate, 14.12.2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 3216/2014, 19 november 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 359/2014 of 28 January 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, Judgement of 19 September 2012, N. 5473/2/2012

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques:

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

91-100 of 127 total results - Page: 1 2 3 ... < 10 11 12 13