Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security -

Ireland,Supreme Court, Minister for Justice & Equality v Ostrowski [2013] IESC 24, appellate, 15 May 2013, [2013] 5 JIC 1501

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Deferential approach - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Romania, Court of Appeal Bucharest, NGO ACCEPT v the National Council for Combating Discrimination

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Sexual orientation -

Romania, Court of Appeal Cluj, Judgement of May 31st 2013

Conflict: Conflict of rights -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Protocol 12, Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination -

Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

United Kingdom, High Court, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al v British Telecommunications

Conflict: Conflict of rights - Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level - Internal - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

United Kingdom, Upper Tribunal, ZAT and others case, judgement of

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

1-8 of 8 total results - Page: 1