Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union

Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -

Austria, Constitutional Court, U466/11 and others

Conflict: Conflict of competence - Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Austria - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 53 - Level of protection - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Croatia, Constitutional Court, legal aid, Judgement of 6 April 2011

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level - Vertical interaction - External - Spill-over dimension -

Categories: Croatia - Constitutional Court - Consumer protection - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

ECtHR, Avotins v. Latvia, judgment of 23 May 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: European Court of Human Rights - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Estonia, Supreme Court, Case no. 3-3-1-11-16, Judgement of 22 March 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial -

European Union, CJEU, Abdoulaye Amadou Tall, judgement of 17 December 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

European Union, CJEU, Alassini et al., Judgement of 18 March 2010

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Italy - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

European Union, CJEU, Aranyosi and Căldăraru, judgment of 5 April 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Case C‑601/15 PPU J.N, Judgement of 15 February 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

1-10 of 25 total results - Page: 1 2 3