Austria, Constitutional Court, U466/11 and others

Conflict: Conflict of competence - Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Austria - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 53 - Level of protection - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

CJEU, Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10) and Roj TV A/S (C-245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial -

France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Ireland, Graham Dwyer v. Data Commissioner, The High Court, n. 351/2015, 6 December 2018

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level -

Categories: Ireland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

Italy, Court of Padua, n. 709/2018, 24 December 2018

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12, Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination -

1-8 of 8 total results - Page: 1