Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -

Belgium, Constitutional Court, n°31/2018, March, 15th 2018

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Belgium - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

ECtHR, Avotins v. Latvia, judgment of 23 May 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: European Court of Human Rights - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial -

France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Greece, Council of State, Case 1901/2014 (Supreme Administrative Court)

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Greece - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 51 - Field of application -

Ireland, Graham Dwyer v. Data Commissioner, The High Court, n. 351/2015, 6 December 2018

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level -

Categories: Ireland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

Italy, Court of Padua, n. 709/2018, 24 December 2018

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

Italy, Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione), Section VI civil, 25 March 2015, Ordinance No. 5926

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum -

1-10 of 19 total results - Page: 1 2