Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -

ECtHR, Avotins v. Latvia, judgment of 23 May 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: European Court of Human Rights - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial -

France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Italy, Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione), Section VI civil, 25 March 2015, Ordinance No. 5926

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum -

Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, Judgement of 19 September 2012, N. 5473/2/2012

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques:

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Spain, Constitutional Court, STC 198/2012, 6 November 2012

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 9 - Right to marry and right to found a family - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination -

1-7 of 7 total results - Page: 1