Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -

Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal -

Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial -

European Union, CJEU, Aziz, Judgement of 14 March 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Banif Plus Bank, Judgement of 21 February 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Biuro podróży ‘Partner’, judgement of 21 December 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Poland - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Kusionova, judgement of 10 September 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 38 - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Pannon, judgement of 4 June 2009

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection -

European Union, CJEU, Pohotovost, judgement 27 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 38 - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

1-10 of 44 total results - Page: 1 > ... 3 4 5