Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia, Case no. I Kz 52/14-6, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Estonia, Riigikohus Supreme Court, Case no 3-3-1-14-16, Judgement of 3 March 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

Estonia, Supreme Court, case no 3-3-1-32-15, Judgement of 15 September 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

Estonia, Supreme Court, Case no. 3-3-1-11-16, Judgement of 22 March 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

European Union, CJEU, Biuro podróży ‘Partner’, judgement of 21 December 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Poland - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Kusionova, judgement of 10 September 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 38 - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Pohotovost, judgement 27 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 38 - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Weber & Putz, judgement 16 June 2011

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: National level - Internal - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

1-10 of 34 total results - Page: 1 2 3 4