Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

CJEU, Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook, C-18/18, pending

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information -

CJEU, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, Case C‑131/12

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information -

CJEU, Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10) and Roj TV A/S (C-245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression -

Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia, Case no. I Kz 52/14-6, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Estonia, Riigikohus Supreme Court, Case no 3-3-1-14-16, Judgement of 3 March 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

Estonia, Supreme Court, case no 3-3-1-32-15, Judgement of 15 September 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

Estonia, Supreme Court, Case no. 3-3-1-11-16, Judgement of 22 March 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

1-10 of 49 total results - Page: 1 > ... 3 4 5