European Union, CJEU, DEB, judgement of 22 December 2010
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -
Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -
Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level -
Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -
Austria, Constitutional Court, U466/11 and others
Conflict: Conflict of competence - Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -
Categories: Austria - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 53 - Level of protection - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -
Croatia, Constitutional Court, legal aid, Judgement of 6 April 2011
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level - Vertical interaction - External - Spill-over dimension -
Categories: Croatia - Constitutional Court - Consumer protection - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -
Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia, Case no. I Kz 52/14-6, Judgement of 17 February 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -
Categories: Croatia - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -
Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights -
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -
Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -
Czech Republic, Constitutional Court, case no ÚS 860/15
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -
Categories: Czech Republic - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture -
ECtHR, Avotins v. Latvia, judgment of 23 May 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition -
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -
Categories: European Court of Human Rights - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -
Estonia, Riigikohus Supreme Court, Case no 3-3-1-14-16, Judgement of 3 March 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -