Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data -

European Union, CJEU, A v. B and Others, judgment of 11 September 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Aranyosi and Căldăraru, judgment of 5 April 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Jeremy F., judgment of 30 May 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Radu, judgment of 29 January 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Ireland, Supreme Court, Dundon v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2005] IESC 83, [2006] 1 IR 518, 19 December 2005

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

Ireland,Supreme Court, Minister for Justice & Equality v Ostrowski [2013] IESC 24, appellate, 15 May 2013, [2013] 5 JIC 1501

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Deferential approach - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick -

1-10 of 17 total results - Page: 1 2