Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union

European Union, CJEU, A, B and C, Judgement of 4 December 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: The Netherlands - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life -

European Union, CJEU, Kusionova, judgement of 10 September 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 38 - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, Radu, judgment of 29 January 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Greece, Administrative Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki, Case no. 1817/2015, Judgement of 8 September 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Greece - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Ireland, The High Court, Smith v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Judgement of 5 March 2012

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Ireland,Supreme Court, Minister for Justice & Equality v Ostrowski [2013] IESC 24, appellate, 15 May 2013, [2013] 5 JIC 1501

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Deferential approach - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Romania, Court of Appeal Bucharest, Case no. 5473/2/2012, Judgement of 9 July 2012

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12, Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination -

Romania, Court of first instance, Case no. 345494-2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

The Netherlands, Judicial division of the Council of State, 201208550/1/V2, supreme, Judgement of 8 July 2015

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture -

1-10 of 11 total results - Page: 1 2