Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union

Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level -

Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -

Austria, Constitutional Court, U466/11 and others

Conflict: Conflict of competence - Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Austria - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 53 - Level of protection - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

European Union, CJEU, Case Orizzonte Salute, judgment of 6 October 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Italy - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Ireland, The High Court, Smith v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Judgement of 5 March 2012

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Sweden, Scania and Blekinge Court of Appeal, B985-12, decision 11 April 2013

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles -

1-5 of 5 total results - Page: 1