Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union

Estonia, Riigikohus Supreme Court, Case no 3-3-1-14-16, Judgement of 3 March 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial -

Estonia, Supreme Court, case no 3-3-1-32-15, Judgement of 15 September 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security -

European Union, CJEU, Arslan, Judgement of 30 May 2013

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Czech Republic - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security -

European Union, CJEU, Case C‑601/15 PPU J.N, Judgement of 15 February 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External -

Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

Ireland, Supreme Court, Dundon v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2005] IESC 83, [2006] 1 IR 518, 19 December 2005

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security -

Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick -

Spain, Constitutional Court, Melloni, STC 26/2014, 13 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Spain - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Sweden, Supreme Court, Decision of November 30 2016, case Ö 5052-16

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination -

1-9 of 9 total results - Page: 1