Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union

Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia, Case no. I Kz 52/14-6, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

European Union, CJEU, C‑429/15, Danqua, Judgement of 20 October 2016

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ireland - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum -

Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning -

Judicial interaction type:

Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum -

Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning -

Judicial interaction type:

Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Consumer protection - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum -

Italy, Supreme Court of Cassation, Iyan v Minister for Internal Affairs and Ors,

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Italy - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture -

1-6 of 6 total results - Page: 1