Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security -

European Union, CJEU, Arslan, Judgement of 30 May 2013

Conflict:

Judicial interaction techniques: Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Czech Republic - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security -

France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition -

Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy -

Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Consumer protection - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial -

Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, Judgement of 19 September 2012, N. 5473/2/2012

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques:

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External -

Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life -

Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009

Conflict: Conflict of interpretation -

Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence -

Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal -

Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick -

1-6 of 6 total results - Page: 1